FACTS
|
|
Forensic intelligence statistics Aust
|
|
|
princeton university studyThere are arguments to support both sides of the use of canines. But to date, despite the best efforts of many talented scientists and technicians, there is no
machine that is as widely used and accepted as the dog for the detection of explosives. https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk1/1992/9235/923509.PDF |
AVIATION SECURITY TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUMEven those with a vested interest in the technology say dogs are better under many circumstances.
"A dog's nose is probably the most sensitive piece of equipment going. They're enormously accurate," said Brook Miller, vice president of Barringer Technologies, one of the companies that will exhibit spectrometry scanners at the Federal Aviation Administration-sponsored Aviation Security Technology Symposium. http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/2001/11/29/tec_330563.shtml#.Vwfd8fkVt5w |
Police Department's counter terrorism unitDogs, with their exquisitely sensitive noses, have been trained in recent years to pick up the scent of explosives on people moving through crowded concourses, and so far they have proved a better early warning system than anything human engineers have come up with.
"They outperform both men and machines," said James Waters, chief of the New York City Police Department's counterterrorism unit, which just this week graduated its latest squad of dogs capable of following the vapor from explosives such as the terrorist bomb-making material of the moment, TATP, used in the Brussels and Paris suicide explosives. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-bomb-dogs-subway-defense-20160326-story.html |